In the recent debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, Harris used a tactic of baiting Trump into making outrageous claims while she appeared composed and prepared. Trump resorted to his usual approach of spouting lies and exaggerations, including claims about immigrants from insane asylums taking American jobs and people in Springfield eating dogs. Harris displayed a performative persona, laughing at Trump’s absurd statements and jabbing at his past business failures. While Trump ranted and raved, Harris maintained a calm demeanor and avoided answering questions directly, prompting Trump to interrupt her multiple times. In the end, Harris’s strategy of letting Trump make outlandish statements and then laughing at him seemed to give her an edge in the debate. However, the overall lack of mature discussion and thoughtful responses from both candidates left much to be desired. The author, Rafael Perez, criticized the debate as a meaningless spectacle of insults and lies, urging readers to pray that there won’t be another one like it.
Source
Photo credit www.dailynews.com
Kamala Harris’ strategy of allowing the controversial figure to speak freely was a successful tactic – Daily News.
