President Biden recently issued a controversial “full and unconditional” pardon to his troubled son Hunter, who had pleaded guilty to tax evasion and lying about his drug addiction on a gun application. While some criticize Biden for prioritizing his family over his commitment to restoring governing norms and the rule of law, opinion columnist Jackie Calmes argues that given the looming threats from former President Trump, the pardon may have been necessary to protect Hunter from potential retaliatory investigations and prosecutions under a Trump administration. With Trump’s history of trying to politicize the Justice Department and allegations against Hunter, the pardon is seen as a preemptive measure.
While many chastise Biden for breaking promises and contributing to a culture of nepotism and corruption in politics, others argue that in the face of an impending Trump presidency, the pardon was a strategic move to protect Hunter from unjust persecution. The pardon has sparked bipartisan backlash, with critics calling for reforms to the unchecked presidential pardon power. Calmes suggests that Biden could make amends by supporting efforts to amend the Constitution to limit the pardon power and by focusing on pardons for deserving individuals who have been wronged by the justice system.
In a time of heightened political tension and threats of retribution, the decision to pardon Hunter Biden highlights the complexities and ethical dilemmas that presidents face when wielding their clemency power. As the debate continues, the role of presidential pardons and the need for accountability and fairness in the justice system remain at the forefront of public discourse.
Source
Photo credit www.latimes.com
