California’s costly program to release and supervise sexually violent predators has come under scrutiny following a state audit that revealed the state spent $93 million over two decades to release 56 high-risk sex offenders. State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones called for the audit, expressing concern over the program’s limited success and lack of oversight. The audit found that offenders in the program re-offended at lower rates compared to those released unconditionally, with participants having a 4 percent recidivism rate. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of placing these offenders in rural communities, with families and community leaders protesting the placements.
The audit recommended creating a system to track compliance with state guidelines and breaking up the contract to increase competition. It also advised adding transitional housing as an interim step to reduce wait times for releasing inmates. However, the Department of State Hospitals rejected the recommendation, stating it would not make placement cheaper or easier.
Meanwhile, a neighborhood dispute involving Assembly candidate Carl DeMaio has raised questions about his residency. DeMaio’s neighbor sought a restraining order against him, claiming harassment, leading to speculation about where DeMaio truly lives. An investigation into DeMaio’s property and voter registration records revealed he rented an apartment in Escondido, within the district he is running in. However, concerns have been raised about candidates actually living in the district they are seeking office in, as seen in a past case of voter fraud. Possible investigations into DeMaio’s residency are currently being kept confidential.
Source
Photo credit voiceofsandiego.org