The campaigns for and against Proposition 33 spent over $140 million in total, with CalMatters fact-checking some of the most common arguments from both sides. The proposition aims to give local governments more authority to limit rent increases. Supporters believe it will help tenants, while opponents, primarily landlords, argue it could hinder housing development. The measure would repeal the Costa Hawkins Rental Housing Act, allowing local governments to implement rent control measures.
One claim is that Proposition 33 would repeal over 100 state housing laws, including affordable housing requirements and eviction protections. However, legal experts suggest that cities attempting to force landlords to charge unviable rents could face legal challenges. Another claim is that the proposition could create over 500 local rent boards, which is mostly true as cities could establish these boards regardless of the outcome.
Furthermore, the proposition is said to worsen the housing crisis according to some experts, while others believe rent control is necessary. It is also claimed that the measure eliminates protections for seniors and veterans, which is false. Additionally, a claim about a 40% increase in homelessness in California since 2019 is deemed false, with a 23% increase reported.
In summary, Proposition 33 is a contentious issue with significant financial backing from both sides. Voters are urged to carefully consider the facts and implications before making a decision.
Source
Photo credit calmatters.org
