In a controversial decision, the Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that American gymnast Jordan Chiles should be stripped of an Olympic bronze medal in the floor exercise. The ruling stated that Chiles’ original score should be reinstated, leading to a revision of the final rankings in the event. This decision came after an appeal by the U.S. team, which argued that Chiles had not received full credit for all her elements during her routine.
Chiles had initially placed fifth in the event, but her score was adjusted after the appeal, securing her a bronze medal. The decision marked the first time in Olympic history that the gymnastics podium featured three Black women. However, Romania filed a separate appeal, claiming that the U.S. appeal was submitted too late.
The ruling by CAS has sparked controversy and backlash, with Chiles facing online bullying and harassment. USA Gymnastics and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee expressed disappointment in the decision and condemned the attacks against Chiles on social media. They praised Chiles for her integrity on and off the competition floor and reiterated their support for her.
The case highlights the complexities and challenges of scoring in gymnastics competitions and the impact of such decisions on athletes. The controversy surrounding the ruling is likely to spark further debate within the gymnastics community and beyond.
Source
Photo credit www.dailynews.com
