The recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions curtailing the powers of federal agencies have sparked controversy, with progressive critics suggesting that the decisions favored big business and corporate interests. However, these critics overlook the fact that many individuals, including those with little wealth or power, often face challenges when dealing with overbearing bureaucrats who operate beyond their authority.
In one case, the court rejected the Chevron doctrine, which required judges to defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes. The majority deemed this rule unworkable and allowing the executive branch to overstep its boundaries. Justice Neil Gorsuch highlighted examples of vulnerable individuals, such as a veteran seeking disability benefits and an immigrant facing deportation, who suffered due to arbitrary agency rules.
In another case, the court ruled that individuals accused of securities fraud have a right to jury trials. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s practice of serving as investigator, prosecutor, and judge in internal proceedings was deemed unconstitutional. This decision impacted not only wealthy individuals but also those with modest means, like single mother Michelle Cochran who faced penalties without a fair trial.
Gorsuch emphasized that individuals, especially those without resources or legal representation, are at a disadvantage when facing regulatory changes driven by bureaucratic whims. The rulings serve as a reminder that everyone, regardless of their background, deserves fair treatment under the law. The decisions highlight the importance of upholding constitutional rights and ensuring that the administrative state does not overstep its bounds.
Source
Photo credit www.dailynews.com